UK was right not to join
flawed euro,
admits Jacques Delors
Times - 17 Jan 2004
By Charles Bremner in Paris and Greg Hurst
Jacques Delors, the former President of the European Commission,
fuelled the controversy over the euro yesterday by admitting
that Britain was justified in opting out of the single currency
because its launch was flawed.
In a remarkably frank interview with The Times, the one-time
bogeyman of Eurosceptics also predicted that Britain would stay
out for years, not least because Gordon Brown was so passionate
about his contempt for Europe.
In another startling admission, the veteran French leftwinger
said that the European Union was in a state of latent
crisis because of weak leadership. He blamed member state
leaders, including President Chirac of France, for putting national
interests before the common good.
M Delors, 78, also spoke with unexpected admiration of Baroness
Thatcher, his old nemesis. He said that she was a figure
who counts in British and European history, and the way
her Conservative colleagues dumped her was an example of the
atrocious manner in which male politicians treat
female colleagues.
But his most surprising comments were on the euro. He lamented
that EU leaders had failed to heed his warning that monetary
union must be matched with close co-ordination of economic policies,
and argued that the euro was consequently less attractive than
it could have been.
Since we have not succeeded in maximising the economic
advantages of the euro, one can understand the British . . .
saying, Things are just fine as they are. Staying out
of the euro hasnt stopped us prospering, he
said.
Denis MacShane, the Minister for Europe, said M Delors
comments, vindicated the Governments sensible decision
. . . to make economic conditions rather than ideology the central
issue as far as the euro is concerned.
But Michael Ancram, the Shadow Foreign Secretary, said: This
is an extraordinary admission by M Delors. If a champion of
European integration says that the euro hasnt worked,
it shows how right Britain has been to stay out, doubly so if
a more harmonised economic policy is proposed as the way forward.
M Delors led the Commission for ten years, pushing through
both the single market and the 1991 Maastricht treaty on monetary
union, and has just published his memoirs. He spoke warmly of
Britain, though he called its aversion to Europe a great
mystery of history. But he was sharply critical of his
own country. He deplored the opposition in France to the EUs
imminent enlargement and President Chiracs attempts to
lay down the law to the former Soviet bloc states because of
their pro-American leanings.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk
British workers close productivity
gap with US and surge ahead of Germany
FT - 17 Feb 2004
By Anna Fifield
The UK's workers are more productive than their German counterparts
and have started to close the gap on rivals in the US, it emerged
yesterday after revised 2002 figures showed that UK productivity
was higher than had been previously thought.
British productivity in 2002 was only 12.8 per cent lower than
the average for the rest of the Group of Seven industrialised
nations, markedly better than the 16.5 per cent gap that was
estimated six months ago, according to revised figures issued
by the Office for National Statistics.
The revised figure is a sharp improvement on the 15.8 per cent
difference recorded in 2001 and will cheer Gordon Brown, the
chancellor, who has placed a high priority on narrowing the
productivity gap but whose efforts had apparently met with limited
success.
The gain was particularly marked against the US, where the
gap shrank between the gross domestic product per worker in
the two countries. Economists believe productivity is determined
by the interplay of a complex set of factors such as skills,
research and development, and the economic cycle.
The initial estimates showed the US had extended its margin
from 28.9 per cent in 2001 to 30.8 per cent the following year
but the revisions showed that in fact it had narrowed to 27.4
per cent. The revisions also showed that Britain was stealing
a march on Germany. The first set of comparisons put German
output 4.6 per cent ahead but the revisions show that Britain
actually had a 1.2 per cent advantage.
The ONS reissued its productivity comparisons yesterday in
the wake of new international price data issued by the Organisation
for Economic Co-operation and Development.
The outlook could be even rosier, because the figures cover
a period when the growth in British productivity was weak. Since
1980 productivity growth has averaged 2 per cent a year, but
over the past two years it has been 1.4 per cent.
George Buckley, an economist at Deutsche Bank, forecast productivity
growth would hit 2.5 per cent by the middle of the year. "The
rise in growth we are expected to see this year is not expected
to be met by the equivalent rise in employment, so you would
expect productivity growth to pick up," he said.
Mr Brown has labelled productivity growth a yardstick for economic
performance and a Treasury spokesman said yesterday that efforts
to tackle the productivity gap were starting to pay off. "Our
continued macro-economic stability and micro-economic reforms
are contributing to an improvement in performance," the
Treasury said.
http://www.ft.com
Joining euro 'would wreak havoc on
housing'
Telegraph - 3 Mar 2003
UK 'four times as sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates'
By David Litterick
BRITAIN'S adoption of the single currency would wreak havoc
on the housing market, according to an independent think-tank
in a study that has intensified the war of words between those
for and against the euro.
The report, by Oxford Economic Forecasting (OEF), suggests
that the UK is four times as sensitive to interest rate changes
because of the differences in the structure of the UK housing
and mortgage markets.
The research, commissioned by the "No" campaign,
looks at the effect of monetary policy on the housing market
- both inside and outside the eurozone - and concludes that
the UK economy would be far more vulnerable inside the euro
to shocks in consumer confidence affecting the housing market.
It cites the much higher level of variable rate mortgage borrowing
in the UK compared with the eurozone, where fixed-rate borrowing
is the norm. The report claims that, if the UK had joined the
euro at the outset, two years of above-trend growth would have
pushed house prices 30pc higher than they are now, sent the
current account deficit ballooning by an extra pounds 50 billion
and caused inflation of 4pc. That would then give way to a technical
recession - two successive quarters of negative growth - leading
to further cycles of boom and bust, which the Chancellor is
aiming to eradicate.
OEF forecasts that a one percentage point rise in interest
rates for two years would slash gross domestic product by 2pc
if the UK were within the euro, compared with a fall of just
1/2 pc for the eurozone as a whole. George Eustace, director
of the "No" campaign, said: "The British housing
market represents a major obstacle to UK membership of the euro.
Higher interest rate sensitivity in Britain is not just a short-term
issue regarding the economic cycle. It reflects fundamental
structural differences which simply won't change in the foreseeable
future. If we give up the ability to set our own interest rates,
we will have no way of reacting to changes in the property market."
Britain in Europe described the research as "flying in
the face of common sense". Philippe Legrain, the lobby
group's chief economist, said: "According to the two most
authoritative economic studies of the issue by the Bank of England
and the IMF, the British economy is no more sensitive to interest
changes than euro-zone economies.
"Nor is the current state of the housing market an obstacle.
The Bank expects house prices to stabilise over the next two
years. This would allow UK interest rates to fall to euro levels
- leading to cheaper mortgages and borrowing for all Britons
without sparking inflation."
© Telegraph
http://www.telegraph.co.uk